Irresponsible Reproduction, Our Illegal Invasion and the Menace of Third Worldism 


August 2002

ACRU receives its share of disparaging emails from "anti-choicers". A recent emotional and critical one declared, "I'm "sick of your demographic logic". For that writer's benefit and for others interested, I must confess that we're not really "pro-choice". ACRU believes in Responsible Reproduction and has long been alarmed and outspoken re our exploding, impoverished, Third World populations. We're more than "pro-choice". We go beyond that, and actively oppose irresponsible reproduction and growing "Third Worldism". We help in promoting "Prevention" and suggest encouraging abortions for irresponsible and unfit parents such as:
Pregnant children (i.e., victims of statutory rape); chronic welfare recipients; drug addicts; illegal aliens; incarcerated felons; incompetents; Muslim extremists, and all impoverished Third Worlders.

Family Planning

Who would reasonably oppose the concept of family planning or "planned parenthood"? ACRU favors conserving and preserving those ideals, values and traditions that made this nation great. We are therefore "conservative" but nonpartisan, and have also been critical of the Republican Party for ignoring population concerns and the pro-choice sentiments of some many Republican voters. Directly related to the abortion issue is the subject of "Family Planning". A July 20 news headline read: "UN To Lose Family Planning Funds". Sub-headline: "Pres. Bush acts after abortion foes accuse Population Fund of supporting abortions in China". We support the efforts of overpopulated Third World nations to control their numbers, and China evidently understands the serious implications of overpopulation. Evidently most Third World peoples (e.g., Islam, Mexico) do not.

Third World, Totalitarian Islam

Among the most dangerous overpopulated peoples on earth are the exploding 1.2 billion prolific, aggressive, antidemocratic Muslims. (All 19 of the Saudi Muslims that murdered 3000 Americans and destroyed the NY World Trade Center were fanatical Muslims.) Essentially all Islamic nations are antidemocratic and totalitarian, and today they pose the greatest menace ever to freedom and to the West. Remember, over 1 million were "cannon fodder", and lost in the war between Iran and Iraq, During Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh who was prepared to fight indefinitely, said they could lose 10 to 1 and win, and he was right. The troops of today's Third World totalitarian enemy leaders are expendable. Ours are not! Nor are the soldiers of Israel. Its continued existence today must be regarded as a miracle. That tiny permissive democracy 1/19th the size of California, is faced with Islamic/Arab enemies 600 times as large that are determined to wipe it off the map. Their troops are expendable, as were Iraq's again in the Gulf War. The troops of tiny, free Israel are not.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mexico, and Our Hemorrhaging Borders

Pro NAFTA, anti-choice Pres. Bush has been having a "love affair" with Mexico's Pres. Vicente Fox. Though Bush declared war on Terrorism after "9/11" and condemned all who "aid and abet", he has failed miserably to deal with our hemorrhaging borders and the flood impoverished, diseased illegals, criminals, drug traffickers and terrorists who have invaded our once great USA. (California is just the first "minority state".) He doesn't seem to understand or care about the ongoing Third World illegal and legal invasion of the US, or perhaps is more interested in competing with the Democrats for VOTES. Fact: Mexico is one of the impoverished and exploding Third World populations, and its ongoing illegal invasion of the US has been serving as its population "pressure release valve". (Mexico City with 16 million in 1987 will be world's largest with 37 million in 2025.) If you think we have a serious border crisis today, just wait a few years! And understand, we're not getting its affluent or middle class. We're being invaded by impoverished, dregs of Mexico who come here illegally, have their large families, duplicate their barrios, overcrowd our schools and jails, demand bilingual education and Spanish communication, socialized medical and welfare services, etc. Its costing US citizens $Billions each year, and we're paying for this in more ways than one. Add to this the "contribution" of other Third World illegal and legal immigrants, and the result is a vastly changed and diminished America, notwithstanding our permissive, pro "multicultural" liberals and supporters of the libertarian and "civil rights" groups. (ACRU stands for a better balance between civil rights and civil responsibilities.)

Conclusion: We feel strongly about the need for worldwide population control and stabilization measures, and though we're definitely not pro UN, (ref our posted criticism) we support most any effort to control the world's exploding impoverished populations. China is trying to do this

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Ongoing Abortion Issue

Attention anti-choicers: Embryos are not babies!!! Besides, its the irresponsible, impoverished low IQ "Third Worlders" here and worldwide who are having most of the babies, and they constitute the ongoing Demographic Catastrophe that too few liberals and conservatives write about. And we're all paying for it in so many ways. Fact: "pro-life" (anti-choice) Italy will loose 28% of its population while the Congo (with rampant AIDS, Hepatitis, TB and a record infant mortality gains by 227%!!! Fact: Bright parents usually have few, and usually bright, kids. Deficient, prolific, thoughtless and irresponsible parents often have an abundance of deficient kids, Not always just too often! Does this sound racist or bigoted? Its neither. ITS FACTUAL!!!! As to "Responsible Reproduction" and the suggestion that these prolific Third Worlders should think before they reproduce: the intellectually "deficient" statistically don't, evidently, do a lot of such thinking, nor do their progenies! That's the problem! Re concerns for their "deficient" embryos, - its like the ACLU's "pro-criminal sympathies", - its "misplaced compassion" for the embryos of thoughtless or irresponsible Third Worlders! Further, the Republican Party leaders today are loosing many good "pro-choice conservatives to the liberal Democratic (Socialist) Party" over this issue. We suggest it be eliminated as a political issue, or that a truly, independent "pro-responsibility American party" be established. Face it, today's increasingly diverse, "Multicultural" electorate has both parties competing for THEIR VOTES, as our increasingly decadent nation "slides into the sewer".

Conclusion: The ACRU is less than optimistic as to the ominous trend of events today. Bush Sr., Powell could and should have destroyed Saddam Hussein, when we had the chance. It would have shown our totalitarian Islamic enemies what we're prepared to do for freedom and democracy. It should have been Unconditional Surrender as it was in WWII ! God save us from our dangerous, "intellectual", permissive, bleeding heart liberals and our political leaders lacking courage to do what must be done. We've been loosing our sovereignty to the Third World controlled UN, and are rapidly becoming another Third World nation. Many feel this this unfortunate process irreversible. Remember, the rise and fall of Rome took a lot longer.

Dr. Howard Garber


Copyright © 2010 American Civil Responsibilities Union, Inc.. All rights reserved.